Most Democrats seem satisfied with Harris's candidacy, but the appeal to skeptical independent voters could be crucial in these elections. A Democratic Party that claims to defend democracy without consistently practicing it runs the risk of alienating the necessary voters to win.
The politics of excessive optimism promoted by advocates claiming "things have never been better" may disconnect the Democratic Party from its roots in the working class. Harris's victory in the elections could spark discussions about her appeal and the success of her campaign, but criticisms of the system that allowed her to secure the nomination without participating in primaries or facing opponents persist.
Democrats are fearful of the threat Trump poses to the institutional structure of the U.S. Most Trump supporters believe that the Biden-Harris years have been negative for them and the country, which could influence the election outcome.
Harris began her presidential campaign by distancing herself from the identity politics that have characterized Democrats, which could mark a shift in the party's strategy. On the other hand, criticism of her candidacy is based on the perception that she was supported by party leaders without facing real competition.
The Democrats' strategy of diverting attention from the real issues facing voters to focus on insults and disqualifications towards those who do not share their views may have a counterproductive effect on the electoral campaign. The tendency towards condescension and information manipulation could also weaken the Democratic Party's position.
As the elections approach, uncertainty about the outcome and the strategies used by parties to attract independent voters become more evident. Infusing political rhetoric with insults and disqualifications does not seem to be an effective way to gain popular support.
