Press freedom is at risk during the presidential elections in the United States. Both the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) and the U.S. section of Reporters Without Borders (RSF) emphasize the importance of the political stance of the upcoming government for the future of the press. Both organizations agree that a victory for Trump could have concerning consequences.
RSF highlights that Trump has attacked the press over 100 times in the last two months, threatening to retaliate against critical media once in power. In his speeches, Trump dismisses the press as 'fake news' and encourages his followers to harass present journalists.
The CPJ expresses concern over the harassment and threats directed at media members by Trump, creating a hostile climate for the press. The organization fears that the tension in the post-election period will be difficult to reduce and that the excesses will negatively impact the media. Additionally, they point out that the incendiary rhetoric against journalists distracts from important political discussions.
Attacks on the traditional press coincide with the growing power of social media, which influences public opinion and sets the political agenda. The viral spread of offensive comments has diverted attention from relevant issues, putting candidates in a tough spot. Meanwhile, traditional media struggle to maintain their relevance in a changing environment, uncertain whether supporting a candidate will help or hurt their credibility.
In a context where press freedom is at stake, the stance of the next U.S. government will have a significant impact on the future of media and its ability to play a watchdog and counterbalance role in society.
